Considering a Hair Transplant? Insider Tips Here

Everyone has heard about or even seen hair transplant horror stories, maybe in a magazine, online or even worse seen the most obvious ‘plugs’ in a elderly friend or relative. However hair transplant surgery has jumped leaps and bound in recent years to make it a viable, safe rather than too risky option for those suffering with male pattern baldness, many celebrities such as Nicholas Cage, Brendan Fraser Mather MOcanhey, Dwayne Johnson (‘the Rock’,WWE) Salman Khan (Bollywood) and also Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi are believed to have had hair transplantation surgery, although such is the stigma attached that none of them have admitted to it publicly, it only becomes obvious when studying before and after pictures.

History of Hair Transplant

The origins of hair transplant surgery stem from Japanese dermatologist, Dr. Okuda, who in 1939 published a revolutionary method in a Japanese medical journal of using small grafts which were similar to the way hair transplantation is performed today. This method involved using hair transplant grafts to correct lost hair from various body areas, like the scalp, eyebrow, and moustache areas.

In the late 50’s one physician in particular, Dr. Norman Orentreich, started to experiment with the thought of relocating or transplanting the hair on the back and sides of the top to the balding areas. Dr. Orentreich’s experiments showed that when bald resistant hairs from the trunk and sides of the head were relocated, they maintained their bald resistant genetic characteristic regardless of where they were transplanted.

This principle, known as “Donor Dominance”, established that hair could possibly be transplanted from the bald resistant donor areas to the balding areas and continue to grow for a life. This laid the building blocks for modern hair transplantation. During the 60’s and 70’s hair transplants grew in popularity. However, the typical of care involved the utilization of larger grafts which were removed by round punches and frequently contained many hairs.

In the 80’s hair restoration surgery evolved dramatically, as the large punch grafts were gradually replaced with a more refined combination of mini and micrografts. This “combination mini micrografting” hair transplantation procedure no more used the punch to extract the bald resistant grafts. Hampshire prp Rather a strip of bald resistant hair was surgically removed from the back of the head and trimmed into mini and micrografts.

Forms of Hair Transplant

You can find two main ways of Follicular unit hair transplant surgery. Follicular unit Transplant often called FUT or ‘strip surgery’ and Follicular unit extraction, commonly known as FUE The primary difference is the approach to extracting the transplanted hair. FUT and FUE are actually complimentary types of HT, not competing ways of which one must make a choice.

FUT versus FUE

The 90’s saw the gradual introduction of an extremely refined medical procedure now known as “follicular unit hair transplantation” or “FUT”. This exacting and labour intensive procedure transplants hairs in their naturally occurring one, two, three, and four hair “follicular unit groupings” where they grow naturally.

The concept of creating the entire hair restoration using exclusively follicular units was proposed by Dr. Robert Bernstein and was described in the 1995 Bernstein and Rassman publication “Follicular Transplantation”. Critical to the success of the follicular unit hair transplant procedure was the introduction of the binocular microscope by Dr. Bobby Limmer of San Antonio Texas in the late 1980’s.

Dr. Limmer found that by using the microscope to examine the donor tissue he and his staff could actually successfully isolate and trim the naturally occurring follicular units into individual grafts. Dr. Limmer shared his techniques and findings with his colleagues and as well as Drs. Bernstein, Rassman and Seager, was a persuasive advocate for the follicular unit hair.

The process involving follicular hair transplants is known as to be the most efficient among hair restoration methods. In follicular hair transplant, the surgeon transplants hair from the permanent zone in the back of the scalp onto the affected areas.

If you need a big area covered, you then most likely desire to go for FUT since it is the less expensive in terms of number of grafts for price paid. If you absolutely, positively don’t want strip surgery as you are concerned about scarring, then FUE is your only alternative. Contrary to popular belief, both methods leave scars. FUT will leave a narrow line over the back of your head, whereas FUE will leave little unpigmented dots across the back of one’s head. The only real difference is that the FUE scars are not concentrated together and for that reason harder to detect when wearing hair very short.

There is no doubt that FUE procedures are harsher on the grafts than FUT procedures. Because of this the final growth yields are generally lower for FUE compared to FUT. But BOTH procedures work with the most part.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *